Should silverblue switch to systemd-sysupdate
From Project Discussion to Ask Fedora
Added silverblue, systemd and removed silverblue-team
May as well just call systemd an OS already
But systemd-sysupdate seems similar to how Android A/B works which is kind of cool. Maybe it could be helpful for running mainline Linux on such devices!
Just because a concept is similar, you cant assume this will fix the non-compatibility with mainline linux XD this is about drivers and more.
And also this may look similar (as A/B root is a simple but effective immutable OS update mechanims) but work very differently under the hood
I think the direction is going to be slowly replace rpm-ostree with the dnf alternative combined with bootc. I don’t know where systemd-sysupdate would fit into that, but it may. AFAIK it isn’t a package installer but more a system updating manager.
Hey, I’m a new Silverblue user. I’ve generally enjoyed the experience, and one of the things I liked a lot was rpm-ostree
. I think dnf
is complicated, but I’ve found rpm-ostree
to be simple and fast. Though, it would be nice to be able to query installed packages with rpm-ostree
instead of rpm -qa
(like with dnf repoquery --installed
), but aside from that, no complaints.
I’m curious what “the dnf alternative” is and what bootc is about.
The gist of it as I understand is … build OCI/Docker container images and deploy that. The abilities of rpm-ostree will be eventually replaced by or integrated into dnf for the benefit of having only one package manager across all versions of Fedora. Bootc can boot OCI/Docker container images. For some time though, rpm-ostree will be the way to do things on Fedora Atomic, even after dnf is part of the base image (say F41) and forward since it is the familiar way, if you try to use it to layer a package it will tell you to use rpm-ostree.
Cool! I can see the sense in using a single package manager for every distribution. I’ve come to like dnf
more the more I get used to it.
From Ask Fedora to The Water Cooler
Added tech-talk and removed silverblue, systemd
while I agree that this may create a very streamlined an (in a way) minimal system, blindly following trends… I dont know.
Atomic Desktops are pretty much the opposite of a free distro. You need an entire separate system to build one.
But still, going fully dependent on systemd… I dont know
@boredsquirrel, branding isn’t a reason to consider not implementing a library, unless SystemD decided yesterday that it intends to financially support the AfD hereafter.
I agree, but this thread is about an existing spin - Silverblue. If you’re to advocate that it not be maintained anymore, you’ll need to do some serious convincing to people not subscribed in this thread.
That has no relation to what I wrote lol
Apologies.