F42 Change Proposal: ibus-libpinyin 1.16 (self-contained)

ibus-libpinyin 1.16

This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.

Wiki
Announced

:link: Summary

The ibus-libpinyin 1.16 package provides some more features for the pinyin users.

:link: Owner

:link: Detailed Description

The ibus-libpinyin 1.16 package provides several features.

Here are the list of the features:

  1. Support punctuation candidates
  2. Support custom keyboard layout option
  3. Support keys for candidate page up/down
  4. Display Lua converters in the input method menu
  5. Notify user when import pinyin or table file finished

:link: Feedback

:link: Benefit to Fedora

These features will improve the user experience when using the pinyin input method.

:link: Scope

  • Proposal owners: libpinyin 2.10 and ibus-libpinyin 1.16

  • Other developers:

  • Release engineering: #Releng issue number

  • Policies and guidelines: N/A (not needed for this Change)

  • Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)

  • Alignment with the Fedora Strategy:

:link: Upgrade/compatibility impact

:link: How To Test

For these features in ibus-libpinyin 1.16, please test the following options:

  1. Change the Keyboard Layout option to check whether it takes effects.
  2. Enable the flip page option to check whether it takes effects.

:link: User Experience

The ibus-libpinyin 1.16 will provide more convenient features for users.

:link: Dependencies

:link: Contingency Plan

  • Contingency mechanism: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
  • Contingency deadline: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
  • Blocks release? N/A (not a System Wide Change)

:link: Documentation

N/A (not a System Wide Change)

:link: Release Notes

The ibus-libpinyin 1.16 package provides some convenient features for the pinyin users.

Last edited by @amoloney 2025-01-15T23:13:50Z

Last edited by @amoloney 2025-01-15T23:13:50Z

How do you feel about the proposal as written?

  • Strongly in favor
  • In favor, with reservations
  • Neutral
  • Opposed, but could be convinced
  • Strongly opposed
0 voters

If you are in favor but have reservations, or are opposed but something could change your mind, please explain in a reply.

We want everyone to be heard, but many posts repeating the same thing actually makes that harder. If you have something new to say, please say it. If, instead, you find someone has already covered what youโ€™d like to express, please simply give that post a :heart: instead of reiterating. You can even do this by email, by replying with the heart emoji or just โ€œ+1โ€. This will make long topics easier to follow.

Please note that this is an advisory โ€œstraw pollโ€ meant to gauge sentiment. It isnโ€™t a vote or a scientific survey. See About the Change Proposals category for more about the Change Process and moderation policy.

This change proposal has now been submitted to FESCo with ticket #3349 for voting.

To find out more, please visit our Changes Policy documentation.

This change proposal has now been submitted to FESCo with ticket #3352 for voting.

To find out more, please visit our Changes Policy documentation.

This change proposal has now been submitted to FESCo with ticket #3353 for voting.

To find out more, please visit our Changes Policy documentation.

Note: only 3353 is real, the other two are for other changes