Consequently, how can I access the compilation log for that specific ISO? I ask because it adheres to the expected naming convention, yet merely is of a version which doesn’t appear to be available via the standard GUI.
So, koji.fedoraproject.org is our build system. Any number of builds,
for any number of reasons could be in there. koji uses a tagging system
to mark what builds are in specific tags, and then compose tooling looks
at packages in those tags to compose images, etc.
Fedora-KDE-Live-x86_64-40-1.14.iso is the image made for the fedora 40
release. It’s never changed after that. It’s released. So it will never
have newer packages in it.
Rawhide images are produced nightly, and thus (barring failues) have the
latest f42 tagged packages.
@kevin, that explains a fair bit. However, the undermentioned appears to contradict it:
[quote=“Kevin Fenzi, post:3, topic:129186, username:kevin”] Fedora nightly compose finder has a list of those
images that last passed testing.
Those are all prerelease images. Not stable releases that have already
been released. So you will find rawhide (f42) and branched (f41)
there, but no where will there be f40/f39.
There is also a ‘respins’ sig that makes updated stable release images: Index of /pub/alt/live-respins
(that’s the release with all updates added)
[/quote]
Those URIs both list ISOs from +2024-08-20, which is certainly an improvement. Thank you.
Yeah, they do save a ton of updates downloading for sure.
@vgaetera, I forgot to ask - does that mean that the -0 and -1 are meaningless? I don’t know how else to think of the designations except as minor releases. Can you elaborate?
The release tag consists not only of a single digit, but also the period and the following characters up to the next dash, it helps distinguish different builds of the same version.
Image and package builds use a similar versioning scheme, but their release tags are not related, and there are no official image builds after the final release, except for respins.