What brought you to fedora?

For me as an average daily user/gamer these were my priorities:

  • Reliable and STABLE OS, which if I shut down at the night, will turn on the next day without issues.
  • Working SELinux for games out of the box.
  • Not outdated, but not too on the edge - just on the perfect balance of up to datedness in terms of programs.
  • Red Hat Enterprise affiliate.
  • Friendly community
  • Quality stuff over quantity stuff

A short story: I used Fedora before - multiple times, but for some odd reasons, I never really valued it, and always underestimated it’s power, and eventually moved on to a next distro. I’ve distrohopped many times (Debian, openSUSE, Ubuntu, Mint, MX, Arch, EndeavourOS, CachyOS just to list a few), and neither distros out there could bring this kind of quality that Fedora brings to us every day, so I learned how valuable and accountable Fedora is, and I appreciated it more and more over the times, and finally I found my place now and I’m settled in at Fedora.

Fedora is a clean, robust, trustworthy, reliable, stable and well documented OS - I can’t wish/want anything better than that. :blue_heart: :fedora:

So, Thank YOU Fedora team, for being here, you guys rock, keep up the good stuff. :party::blue_heart:

Edit: I went back to Linux Mint, Fedora became very unreliable by these constant failure kernel updates. So :fu: Fedora.

3 Likes

I use to use Ubuntu from its popularity and support especially since I had used a spin of it at Google. They started putting in apps that were third-party and also arbitrary. I read about Fedora’s build system and how it was better, and since I encountered many build issues (who hasn’t?). I decided to pay the price of learning how to use a different/new technology for a more efficient work-flow. I like how it’s set up, that it’s not Arch, hardware support, the community, and the GUI and associated application management.

I’m developing a website (link in my profile) that requires me to be as efficient as possible since it’s only me. Now with AI (which I am personally very excited about) I can develop even faster. Check out the DreamStation portion for example - I used Gemini to make a Next.js site and components with simple English descriptions and some elbow grease.

2 Likes

Yes I am excited too about the AI, think how many people will be looking for a job soon.

Started my Linux journey some time ago with Linux Mint. Didn’t had any real issues with it but back then I’ve been told one would get better gaming performance with more recent packages/drivers.

Bleeding edge was not really an option for me as I don’t have (or want to) spend a lot of time tinkering or compiling my own stuff all the time anymore. Fedora seemed to me a good ā€œcompromiseā€. Fedora has more recent packages and drivers than a LTS based distro and more stable than a bleeding edge distro.

So I installed Fedora and… didn’t notice any gaming performance improvements whatsoever :grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:
But i liked Fedora anyway so i kept it ever since.

2 Likes

Life on the edge is exciting. It is not for everyone, because it comes with additional risks.

That said, ā€˜Life on the edge’ in Fedora Universe implies the ā€œRawhideā€ version. You don’t actually need to compile anything by yourself when using Rawhide. Nevertheless, you get the most recent software fresh hot from development repos.

If you don’t mind reporting bugs and you know your way around headless Linux, Fedora Rawhide may bring you adventure. The community could use extra brave users to help make the final release more robust for everyone.

2 Likes

I started with Linux Mint, but I feel like it was not updated in a timely fashion and security was not the top priority…

I prefer an operating system that stays on top of updates and uses more advanced technology (like SELinux and BTRFS)… šŸ–“ :fedora:

Happy to say :fedora: has not failed Me for going on 1 year now… :folded_hands:

2 Likes

This is my thought too. It’s up near the head of the pack, but far enough back to avoid the ugly pileups from unforeseen obstacles. I don’t want bleeding edge, but if I’m going to use a modern linux, I want it more or less current, not half the features two years behind.

Fedora hits that sweet spot.

3 Likes

What brought me to Fedora was the fact that it got frequent updates and had the latest KDE Plasma, but didn’t seem quite as bleeding-edge as Arch. That, and the fact that I like the Fedora branding way more than I do OpenSuSE. Well, that and hearing about Windows 10’s demise a year or two ago and deciding that if I’m a programmer anyway, might as well make the jump to Linux.

Also also: The game I contribute to in my spare time is a PAIN to compile on windows, whereas on Linux it’s about 2 commands (cmake and ninja/make).

I had a friend that brought me to Linux, and ironically enough I went full-linux before she did xD

I’ve been using Fedora ever since, and if I ever switch it’ll probably be to either a Fedora derivative like Ultramarine or to an Arch derivative.

2 Likes

What kind of stuff does it need to compile?


I do WoW servers, and do cmake with a one-liner and then the compile through CLI:

"%ProgramFiles%\CMake\bin\cmake.exe" -S "%UserProfile%\Projects\TrinityCore-335\src" -B "%UserProfile%\Projects\TrinityCore-335\build" -G "Visual Studio 17 2022" --fresh -Wno-dev -DBOOST_ROOT="%SYSTEMDRIVE%/local/boost_1_89_0" -DMYSQL_INCLUDE_DIR="%ProgramFiles%\MariaDB 12.1\include\mysql" -DMYSQL_LIBRARY="%ProgramFiles%\MariaDB 12.1\lib\libmariadb.lib" -DWITHOUT_METRICS="1" -DTOOLS="1"
"%ProgramFiles%\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Community\MSBuild\Current\Bin\amd64\MSBuild.exe" "%UserProfile%\Projects\TrinityCore-335\build\ALL_BUILD.vcxproj" -target:"Rebuild" -property:"Configuration=Release"

Linux I just have it all combined for a real one-liner :stuck_out_tongue:

rm -Rf ~/'Projects/TrinityCore-335/build' ~/'Projects/TrinityCore-335/run' && mkdir -p ~/'Projects/TrinityCore-335/build' ~/'Projects/TrinityCore-335/run' && cd ~/'Projects/TrinityCore-335/build' && cmake ~/'Projects/TrinityCore-335/src' -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=~/'Projects/TrinityCore-335/run' -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE='Release' -DWITHOUT_METRICS='1' -DTOOLS='1' -DNOJEM='1' && make --jobs=$(nproc) install

C++, and the main way to compile on Windows is a Visual Studio project that everyone seems to find a real pain in the ass to compile for whatever reason. Then again, you using MSBuild suggests that maybe it really is a problem we’d solve by just telling people to use MSBuild directly instead of going through Visual Studio.

1 Like

God lol,In all seriousness me being interested to tech

Re the OP, what brought me to Fedora was a desire to improve security while continuing to avoid Microsoft, Apple and Google:

I would like to try SilverBlue or SecureBlue, but for the time being they are beyond my competence. Maybe I will give them a try when I have an old laptop on which I can run experiments.

What brought you to fedora?

There were a combination of factors, but Silverblue is the reason I stayed.

I’ve hopped from various distros (void, debian, etc.) at various times after stays of varying durations. Funnily enough, I’ve never actually used ā€œtraditionalā€ Fedora on bare metal, but at some point I found out about Silverblue and became curious. The concept of the ā€œimmutable base layerā€ struck me at first as kind of just a gimmick, but then I actually tried it, and I guess you could say I’m completely sold now. :laughing: Fast forward a few months and I’ve gone all-in to the OCI/bootc tech stack (as far as is feasible anyways) and am running my own Silverblue derivative image.

To me this represents the ideal of something I’ve wanted for a long time: the power and freedom of Linux but without the maintenance overhead you have on a ā€œroll your ownā€ setup like what I had using awesomewm on Void Linux. I used that setup for several years and loved it, but at some point I just had to admit that there are more important things than modifying every last detail of your system.

With Silverblue I can customize what actually matters to me and enjoy it without needing to worry about functional gaps in my setup and random stuff breaking at the most inconvenient time. Having Fedora as my upstream means I can just use my computer like any sane and normal person and expect things like screen sharing, automatic mounting of external drives, or even gasp printer detection to just work without me needing to spend hours figuring out how the big distros do it and then cobbling together some half-working solution that falls apart if you look at it wrong.

5 Likes

Greetings, I’m new here (and to Fedora).

I have, in fact, been using Fedora 43 (KDE) for just over a week, after having used Zorin OS as my only OS on my HP Victus laptop (a September 2024 make) for about 10 months, ever since I switched to it from an older laptop, a Dell Latitude.

I have been interested in computers from age 4 till date (even though I am now an aspiring electrical engineer, not a computer science engineer). I am turning 18 shortly.

I first explored Linux (Ubuntu and Mint, the usual two beginner distros) when I was 12 (right around the time COVID first hit, lockdowns begun and there suddenly was lots of free time on hand), even deeper when I was 13 (when I discovered Zorin OS and took an instant liking to it), and completely shifted to it at 16. Until then, I was oscillating between Windows and Linux installs on that old Latitude laptop.

I had liked Windows 7 for more reasons than Aero. In fact, that was the Windows version on which the computing instincts I still have today were formed (window management, keyboard shortcuts, process and resource monitoring, familiarity with operations like system restore, defragmentation and registry editing). Even now, I appreciate some, if not all, parts of the Windows NT philosophy.

The Fedora KDE equivalents of Windows power tools are, in my opinion, even more feature-rich and informative than the Windows ones, and unlike GNOME, they aren’t retrofitted onto the base OS.

I have themed my KDE to look like Windows 7 without copying it one-for-one (especially considering that Wayland will, in the future, be the sole windowing system, and existing ā€œtotal conversionā€ packs are built on X11 design assumptions which do not translate well to Wayland). I have achieved an equivalent of the Aero design, adapted for 2026 and beyond.

Now, I am no novice. However, I do not resonate with the philosophies of distros such as Arch, Gentoo or Alpine, because my use case is different. (I had tried Arch on a VM when I was 14, and did manage to build a more-or-less functional KDE desktop, but didn’t really find it rewarding.)

So, while Zorin was the distro which initiated me into Linux (and into things like user privacy awareness, as helpful side effects), Fedora is the distro which I think will serve me well in the future, as I step into adulthood and allow my childhood curiosity to mature into technical wisdom.

I’ve been noticing a few things about Fedora KDE over the past 10 days since installing it, such as how KCalc includes values of physical constants such as the impedance of vacuum, in scientific mode! I don’t know whether this is a Fedora thing, or a KDE thing, but this is one among numerous other reasons why I took a liking to Fedora KDE, especially given my electrical engineering interest, and my wish for my Linux system to grow with me.

Moreover, I deeply dislike what Windows has become today, which is why I had tried out Linux in the first place, even before Windows 11 was released. This experiment had, well, side effects too, because I now use FOSS almost exclusively on my laptop, even though I am not zealous about philosophy (if I was, I would reject all things proprietary, including Nvidia drivers, which is impractical for me!)

FOSS, to me, is not about ideological purity. The below screenshot is of a post on forum.fossunited.org about the nature of FOSS philosophy, which struck a chord with me.

My use case is highly mixed. I use my laptop to learn various things, write essays, run VMs to experiment (I have often experimented with distros and DEs), edit audio and maintain a USB audio guitar amp setup, game (ETS2, Open Rails) and run BOINC (often in the background while engaging in lighter tasks, when AC power is available), and with Fedora, I can get stuff done with less hiccups than previously on Zorin OS on this same laptop. Interestingly, it took me only about 2 days to attain a stable footing, after the new install. The same distro and DE had overwhelmed me when I was 14!

Like I said earlier, I want my system to grow with me, now that I am stepping into adulthood. Fedora KDE is, therefore, my favourite. It would not be wrong if I say that Fedora represents the successful culmination of an almost 6-year-long experiment, which started with my thought that ā€œthere must be something betterā€, when a Windows 10 laptop (not that Latitude I mentioned earlier) I was using was acting up.

5 Likes

That is an interesting point. There comes a point where one just wants the system to behave like an adult, and to not constantly ā€œtalk backā€ or try to ā€œprove its independenceā€. To work with you, not against you.

1 Like

Hi Community,

First message to thanks the fedora’s team for the ā€œsoā€ great KDE plasma system. I was a Microsoft user during 20 years and had some doubts to quit a system i used for a long time. And i have to admit that, after testing a lot of Linux flavours, I found something impressive on Fedora : stability, easy of use, all office & Web apps I used before, UX so polished…

So, it’s not in my habits to share my thoughts about OS but this short message to share my really satisfaction about fedora after 8 heavy months of use :heart_hands:

5 Likes

Hi folks,

Another (relative) newbie here!

My first venture into the Wonderful World of Linux came when my prehistoric (well, steam-powered, at least… ) desktop PC was no longer capable of taking Windows updates, so I decided to take the plunge and switch it to Linux (Debian in this instance).

After running this for a while, I then stumbled across a video on the ā€œVeronica Explainsā€ YT channel explaining how to convert an old, time-expired Chromebook to run Linux. One of the distros she recommended was Fedora, so after successfully blowing away the original Chrome BIOS on an old, time-expired Chromebook I just happened to have lying around and replacing it with a Mr Chromebox / Coreboot alternative, I installed Fedora Workstation 41, and created a Chrultrabook. So far, so good, does everything I need it to do, though it’d be nice if it had more than a 16GB SSD and 2GB RAM so when my later Chromebook (32GB SSD / 4GB RAM) also reaches EoL, I’ll be attempting to do the same with that as well. Or maybe I’ll just buy a proper laptop and set that up with Fedora instead… :grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:

1 Like

When I was checking out Linux for the first time, it was Red Hat Linux 5.2 in 1998, which a friend of mine recommended, ā€œbecause Linux is great, and you have to try it!ā€. I decided I wanted to ā€œmake a firewallā€ (hey, you have to start somewhere!), using a PC that I didn’t use and in which I installed 2 NICs, both Intel EE16’s. That project failed pretty quickly: Linux wouldn’t recognize the one of the two NICs, no matter which slot I put either them into, no matter its configuration. Both NICs worked fine with Windows, so I knew both were functional. I was entirely new to Linux and the internet was still pretty young (for me anyway), Google had only just been founded, and there wasn’t nearly as much information to be found as there is today. So, I didn’t know if that could be fixed, let alone how to do that, and I abandoned that project.

Next, Red Hat Linux 6.0 came out, and I decided to try again, also deciding that if it failed again, I would abandon the whole Linux thing. But this time everything worked the way I wanted, and I became more and more interested in the whole ā€œLinux thingā€.

I think I remember RHL having Gnome, but at some point I started to dislike Gnome. It became (too) rigid in what I could do with it, and I didn’t want to invest time into seeing if I could fix that. I checked out other desktop environments. Long story short, I’ve stuck with KDE ever since, because it did what I wanted it to do right out of the box.

Around mid 2000, I had started working professionally with Linux: CentOS and RHEL specifically. I had tried other distros before, among which: SUSE (I think that’s when I first encountered KDE), Debian, (K)Ubuntu, Mint, and I ran Slackware for a while (learned a lot from that…). In the end, I reverted Fedora.

For me, Fedora was an obvious choice, given that I mostly work with RHEL. All pc’s I own run Fedora, with one exception: to be able to run some programs that e.g. handle hardware and don’t run well or at all in Wine. But that pc isn’t used much.

1 Like

I like a less-is more approach in everything I do. When I finally switched to Linux 7 months ago, I initially went with Bazzite, which worked like a charm to be honest. However, I always felt it was too laden with features.

So eventually switched to Fedora Kinoite and can safely say I’ve made the right choice. Everything feels and operates just how I want it. Packages are always up-to-date, stability is good, toolbox gives me everything the Atomic side of things lack while keeping the image clean.

I can do gaming, I can do programming and I have a calm and silent system.

3 Likes

idk why I chose this…but man, am I happy I did…it works great for everything I want…

1 Like