Errors when running kernel testing

Ask Fedora
1

Is anyone else seeing this or did I forget to install something:
sudo ./runtests.sh -t performance
Test suite called with performance
lat_rpc.c:24:10: error: conflicting types for ‘client_rpc_xact_1’; have ‘char *(char *, CLIENT *)’ {aka ‘char *(char *, struct __rpc_client *)’}
24 | char *client_rpc_xact_1(char *argp, CLIENT *clnt);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from lat_rpc.c:19:
bench.h:321:14: note: previous declaration of ‘client_rpc_xact_1’ with type ‘char *(void)’
321 | extern char *client_rpc_xact_1();
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c: In function ‘main’:
lat_rpc.c:136:33: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘lmbench_usage’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
136 | lmbench_usage(ac, av, usage);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c: At top level:
lat_rpc.c:176:1: error: conflicting types for ‘client_rpc_xact_1’; have ‘char *(char *, CLIENT *)’ {aka ‘char *(char *, struct __rpc_client *)’}
176 | client_rpc_xact_1(char *argp, CLIENT *clnt)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
bench.h:321:14: note: previous declaration of ‘client_rpc_xact_1’ with type ‘char *(void)’
321 | extern char client_rpc_xact_1();
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c: In function ‘rpc_xact_1’:
lat_rpc.c:193:1: warning: old-style function definition [-Wold-style-definition]
193 | rpc_xact_1(msg, transp)
| ^~~~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c:196:1: error: number of arguments doesn’t match prototype
196 | {
| ^
bench.h:320:14: error: prototype declaration
320 | extern char rpc_xact_1();
| ^~~~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c: In function ‘server_main’:
lat_rpc.c:218:57: warning: passing argument 4 of ‘svc_register’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
218 | if (!svc_register(transp, XACT_PROG, XACT_VERS, xact_prog_1, IPPROTO_UDP)) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
| |
| void ()(void)
In file included from /usr/include/tirpc/rpc/svc.h:463,
from /usr/include/tirpc/rpc/rpc.h:63,
from bench.h:38:
/usr/include/tirpc/rpc/svc_soc.h:70:21: note: expected ‘void ()(struct svc_req *, SVCXPRT )’ {aka ‘void ()(struct svc_req , struct __rpc_svcxprt )’} but argument is of type ‘void ()(void)’
70 | void ()(struct svc_req , SVCXPRT ), int);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c:202:13: note: ‘xact_prog_1’ declared here
202 | static void xact_prog_1();
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c:228:57: warning: passing argument 4 of ‘svc_register’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
228 | if (!svc_register(transp, XACT_PROG, XACT_VERS, xact_prog_1, IPPROTO_TCP)) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
| |
| void ()(void)
/usr/include/tirpc/rpc/svc_soc.h:70:21: note: expected ‘void ()(struct svc_req , SVCXPRT )’ {aka ‘void ()(struct svc_req , struct __rpc_svcxprt )’} but argument is of type ‘void ()(void)’
70 | void ()(struct svc_req , SVCXPRT ), int);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c:202:13: note: ‘xact_prog_1’ declared here
202 | static void xact_prog_1();
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c: In function ‘xact_prog_1’:
lat_rpc.c:240:1: warning: old-style function definition [-Wold-style-definition]
240 | xact_prog_1(rqstp, transp)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c:257:30: warning: assignment to ‘bool_t ()(void)’ {aka ‘int ()(void)’} from incompatible pointer type ‘bool_t ()(XDR *, char )’ {aka ‘int ()(struct __rpc_xdr *, char )’} [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
257 | xdr_argument = xdr_char;
| ^
In file included from /usr/include/tirpc/rpc/rpc.h:43:
/usr/include/tirpc/rpc/xdr.h:316:17: note: ‘xdr_char’ declared here
316 | extern bool_t xdr_char(XDR , char );
| ^~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c:258:28: warning: assignment to ‘bool_t ()(void)’ {aka ‘int ()(void)’} from incompatible pointer type ‘bool_t ()(XDR *, char )’ {aka ‘int ()(struct __rpc_xdr *, char *)’} [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
258 | xdr_result = xdr_char;
| ^
/usr/include/tirpc/rpc/xdr.h:316:17: note: ‘xdr_char’ declared here
316 | extern bool_t xdr_char(XDR *, char *);
| ^~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c:276:19: error: too many arguments to function ‘local’; expected 0, have 2
276 | result = (*local)(&argument, rqstp);
| ~^~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~
gmake[2]: *** [Makefile:397: ../bin/x86_64-linux-gnu/lat_rpc] Error 1
make[1]: *** [Makefile:114: lmbench] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:20: build] Error 2
lat_rpc.c:24:10: error: conflicting types for ‘client_rpc_xact_1’; have ‘char *(char *, CLIENT *)’ {aka ‘char *(char *, struct __rpc_client *)’}
24 | char *client_rpc_xact_1(char *argp, CLIENT *clnt);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from lat_rpc.c:19:
bench.h:321:14: note: previous declaration of ‘client_rpc_xact_1’ with type ‘char *(void)’
321 | extern char *client_rpc_xact_1();
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c: In function ‘main’:
lat_rpc.c:136:33: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘lmbench_usage’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
136 | lmbench_usage(ac, av, usage);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c: At top level:
lat_rpc.c:176:1: error: conflicting types for ‘client_rpc_xact_1’; have ‘char *(char *, CLIENT *)’ {aka ‘char *(char *, struct __rpc_client *)’}
176 | client_rpc_xact_1(char *argp, CLIENT *clnt)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
bench.h:321:14: note: previous declaration of ‘client_rpc_xact_1’ with type ‘char *(void)’
321 | extern char client_rpc_xact_1();
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c: In function ‘rpc_xact_1’:
lat_rpc.c:193:1: warning: old-style function definition [-Wold-style-definition]
193 | rpc_xact_1(msg, transp)
| ^~~~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c:196:1: error: number of arguments doesn’t match prototype
196 | {
| ^
bench.h:320:14: error: prototype declaration
320 | extern char rpc_xact_1();
| ^~~~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c: In function ‘server_main’:
lat_rpc.c:218:57: warning: passing argument 4 of ‘svc_register’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
218 | if (!svc_register(transp, XACT_PROG, XACT_VERS, xact_prog_1, IPPROTO_UDP)) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
| |
| void ()(void)
In file included from /usr/include/tirpc/rpc/svc.h:463,
from /usr/include/tirpc/rpc/rpc.h:63,
from bench.h:38:
/usr/include/tirpc/rpc/svc_soc.h:70:21: note: expected ‘void ()(struct svc_req *, SVCXPRT )’ {aka ‘void ()(struct svc_req , struct __rpc_svcxprt )’} but argument is of type ‘void ()(void)’
70 | void ()(struct svc_req , SVCXPRT ), int);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c:202:13: note: ‘xact_prog_1’ declared here
202 | static void xact_prog_1();
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c:228:57: warning: passing argument 4 of ‘svc_register’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
228 | if (!svc_register(transp, XACT_PROG, XACT_VERS, xact_prog_1, IPPROTO_TCP)) {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
| |
| void ()(void)
/usr/include/tirpc/rpc/svc_soc.h:70:21: note: expected ‘void ()(struct svc_req , SVCXPRT )’ {aka ‘void ()(struct svc_req , struct __rpc_svcxprt )’} but argument is of type ‘void ()(void)’
70 | void ()(struct svc_req , SVCXPRT ), int);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c:202:13: note: ‘xact_prog_1’ declared here
202 | static void xact_prog_1();
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c: In function ‘xact_prog_1’:
lat_rpc.c:240:1: warning: old-style function definition [-Wold-style-definition]
240 | xact_prog_1(rqstp, transp)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c:257:30: warning: assignment to ‘bool_t ()(void)’ {aka ‘int ()(void)’} from incompatible pointer type ‘bool_t ()(XDR *, char )’ {aka ‘int ()(struct __rpc_xdr *, char )’} [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
257 | xdr_argument = xdr_char;
| ^
In file included from /usr/include/tirpc/rpc/rpc.h:43:
/usr/include/tirpc/rpc/xdr.h:316:17: note: ‘xdr_char’ declared here
316 | extern bool_t xdr_char(XDR , char );
| ^~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c:258:28: warning: assignment to ‘bool_t ()(void)’ {aka ‘int ()(void)’} from incompatible pointer type ‘bool_t ()(XDR *, char )’ {aka ‘int ()(struct __rpc_xdr *, char *)’} [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
258 | xdr_result = xdr_char;
| ^
/usr/include/tirpc/rpc/xdr.h:316:17: note: ‘xdr_char’ declared here
316 | extern bool_t xdr_char(XDR *, char *);
| ^~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c:276:19: error: too many arguments to function ‘local’; expected 0, have 2
276 | result = (*local)(&argument, rqstp);
| ~^~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~
gmake[2]: *** [Makefile:397: ../bin/x86_64-linux-gnu/lat_rpc] Error 1
make[1]: *** [Makefile:114: lmbench] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:23: results] Error 2
./performance/lmbench3 PASS

Test suite complete PASS

Your log file is being submitted…
/home/gbcox/Downloads/kernel-tests/logs/kernel-test-1749401774.log.txt
{“message”:“Upload successful!”}

The following information is not submitted with your log;
it is for informational purposes only.
Vulnerability status:
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/gather_data_sampling:Not affected
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/ghostwrite:Not affected
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/indirect_target_selection:Not affected
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/itlb_multihit:Not affected
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/l1tf:Not affected
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/mds:Not affected
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/meltdown:Not affected
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/mmio_stale_data:Not affected
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/reg_file_data_sampling:Not affected
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/retbleed:Not affected
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/spec_rstack_overflow:Mitigation: Safe RET
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/spec_store_bypass:Mitigation: Speculative Store Bypass disabled via prctl
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/spectre_v1:Mitigation: usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/spectre_v2:Mitigation: Enhanced / Automatic IBRS; IBPB: conditional; STIBP: always-on; PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected; BHI: Not affected
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/srbds:Not affected
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/tsx_async_abort:Not affected

2

When posting text like this please format as pre-formatted text so it is easier to read.

3

In this case, I believe what I originally posted was easier to read, but here you go:

sudo ./runtests.sh -t performance
Test suite called with performance
lat_rpc.c:24:10: error: conflicting types for ‘client_rpc_xact_1’; have ‘char *(char *, CLIENT *)’ {aka ‘char *(char *, struct __rpc_client *)’}
   24 | char    *client_rpc_xact_1(char *argp, CLIENT *clnt);
      |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from lat_rpc.c:19:
bench.h:321:14: note: previous declaration of ‘client_rpc_xact_1’ with type ‘char *(void)’
  321 | extern char *client_rpc_xact_1();
      |              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c: In function ‘main’:
lat_rpc.c:136:33: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘lmbench_usage’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
  136 |                                 lmbench_usage(ac, av, usage);
      |                                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c: At top level:
lat_rpc.c:176:1: error: conflicting types for ‘client_rpc_xact_1’; have ‘char *(char *, CLIENT *)’ {aka ‘char *(char *, struct __rpc_client *)’}
  176 | client_rpc_xact_1(char *argp, CLIENT *clnt)
      | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
bench.h:321:14: note: previous declaration of ‘client_rpc_xact_1’ with type ‘char *(void)’
  321 | extern char *client_rpc_xact_1();
      |              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c: In function ‘rpc_xact_1’:
lat_rpc.c:193:1: warning: old-style function definition [-Wold-style-definition]
  193 | rpc_xact_1(msg, transp)
      | ^~~~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c:196:1: error: number of arguments doesn’t match prototype
  196 | {
      | ^
bench.h:320:14: error: prototype declaration
  320 | extern char *rpc_xact_1();
      |              ^~~~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c: In function ‘server_main’:
lat_rpc.c:218:57: warning: passing argument 4 of ‘svc_register’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
  218 |         if (!svc_register(transp, XACT_PROG, XACT_VERS, xact_prog_1, IPPROTO_UDP)) {
      |                                                         ^~~~~~~~~~~
      |                                                         |
      |                                                         void (*)(void)
In file included from /usr/include/tirpc/rpc/svc.h:463,
                 from /usr/include/tirpc/rpc/rpc.h:63,
                 from bench.h:38:
/usr/include/tirpc/rpc/svc_soc.h:70:21: note: expected ‘void (*)(struct svc_req *, SVCXPRT *)’ {aka ‘void (*)(struct svc_req *, struct __rpc_svcxprt *)’} but argument is of type ‘void (*)(void)’
   70 |                     void (*)(struct svc_req *, SVCXPRT *), int);
      |                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c:202:13: note: ‘xact_prog_1’ declared here
  202 | static void xact_prog_1();
      |             ^~~~~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c:228:57: warning: passing argument 4 of ‘svc_register’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
  228 |         if (!svc_register(transp, XACT_PROG, XACT_VERS, xact_prog_1, IPPROTO_TCP)) {
      |                                                         ^~~~~~~~~~~
      |                                                         |
      |                                                         void (*)(void)
/usr/include/tirpc/rpc/svc_soc.h:70:21: note: expected ‘void (*)(struct svc_req *, SVCXPRT *)’ {aka ‘void (*)(struct svc_req *, struct __rpc_svcxprt *)’} but argument is of type ‘void (*)(void)’
   70 |                     void (*)(struct svc_req *, SVCXPRT *), int);
      |                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c:202:13: note: ‘xact_prog_1’ declared here
  202 | static void xact_prog_1();
      |             ^~~~~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c: In function ‘xact_prog_1’:
lat_rpc.c:240:1: warning: old-style function definition [-Wold-style-definition]
  240 | xact_prog_1(rqstp, transp)
      | ^~~~~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c:257:30: warning: assignment to ‘bool_t (*)(void)’ {aka ‘int (*)(void)’} from incompatible pointer type ‘bool_t (*)(XDR *, char *)’ {aka ‘int (*)(struct __rpc_xdr *, char *)’} [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
  257 |                 xdr_argument = xdr_char;
      |                              ^
In file included from /usr/include/tirpc/rpc/rpc.h:43:
/usr/include/tirpc/rpc/xdr.h:316:17: note: ‘xdr_char’ declared here
  316 | extern bool_t   xdr_char(XDR *, char *);
      |                 ^~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c:258:28: warning: assignment to ‘bool_t (*)(void)’ {aka ‘int (*)(void)’} from incompatible pointer type ‘bool_t (*)(XDR *, char *)’ {aka ‘int (*)(struct __rpc_xdr *, char *)’} [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
  258 |                 xdr_result = xdr_char;
      |                            ^
/usr/include/tirpc/rpc/xdr.h:316:17: note: ‘xdr_char’ declared here
  316 | extern bool_t   xdr_char(XDR *, char *);
      |                 ^~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c:276:19: error: too many arguments to function ‘local’; expected 0, have 2
  276 |         result = (*local)(&argument, rqstp);
      |                  ~^~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~
gmake[2]: *** [Makefile:397: ../bin/x86_64-linux-gnu/lat_rpc] Error 1
make[1]: *** [Makefile:114: lmbench] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:20: build] Error 2
lat_rpc.c:24:10: error: conflicting types for ‘client_rpc_xact_1’; have ‘char *(char *, CLIENT *)’ {aka ‘char *(char *, struct __rpc_client *)’}
   24 | char    *client_rpc_xact_1(char *argp, CLIENT *clnt);
      |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from lat_rpc.c:19:
bench.h:321:14: note: previous declaration of ‘client_rpc_xact_1’ with type ‘char *(void)’
  321 | extern char *client_rpc_xact_1();
      |              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c: In function ‘main’:
lat_rpc.c:136:33: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘lmbench_usage’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
  136 |                                 lmbench_usage(ac, av, usage);
      |                                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c: At top level:
lat_rpc.c:176:1: error: conflicting types for ‘client_rpc_xact_1’; have ‘char *(char *, CLIENT *)’ {aka ‘char *(char *, struct __rpc_client *)’}
  176 | client_rpc_xact_1(char *argp, CLIENT *clnt)
      | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
bench.h:321:14: note: previous declaration of ‘client_rpc_xact_1’ with type ‘char *(void)’
  321 | extern char *client_rpc_xact_1();
      |              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c: In function ‘rpc_xact_1’:
lat_rpc.c:193:1: warning: old-style function definition [-Wold-style-definition]
  193 | rpc_xact_1(msg, transp)
      | ^~~~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c:196:1: error: number of arguments doesn’t match prototype
  196 | {
      | ^
bench.h:320:14: error: prototype declaration
  320 | extern char *rpc_xact_1();
      |              ^~~~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c: In function ‘server_main’:
lat_rpc.c:218:57: warning: passing argument 4 of ‘svc_register’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
  218 |         if (!svc_register(transp, XACT_PROG, XACT_VERS, xact_prog_1, IPPROTO_UDP)) {
      |                                                         ^~~~~~~~~~~
      |                                                         |
      |                                                         void (*)(void)
In file included from /usr/include/tirpc/rpc/svc.h:463,
                 from /usr/include/tirpc/rpc/rpc.h:63,
                 from bench.h:38:
/usr/include/tirpc/rpc/svc_soc.h:70:21: note: expected ‘void (*)(struct svc_req *, SVCXPRT *)’ {aka ‘void (*)(struct svc_req *, struct __rpc_svcxprt *)’} but argument is of type ‘void (*)(void)’
   70 |                     void (*)(struct svc_req *, SVCXPRT *), int);
      |                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c:202:13: note: ‘xact_prog_1’ declared here
  202 | static void xact_prog_1();
      |             ^~~~~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c:228:57: warning: passing argument 4 of ‘svc_register’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
  228 |         if (!svc_register(transp, XACT_PROG, XACT_VERS, xact_prog_1, IPPROTO_TCP)) {
      |                                                         ^~~~~~~~~~~
      |                                                         |
      |                                                         void (*)(void)
/usr/include/tirpc/rpc/svc_soc.h:70:21: note: expected ‘void (*)(struct svc_req *, SVCXPRT *)’ {aka ‘void (*)(struct svc_req *, struct __rpc_svcxprt *)’} but argument is of type ‘void (*)(void)’
   70 |                     void (*)(struct svc_req *, SVCXPRT *), int);
      |                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c:202:13: note: ‘xact_prog_1’ declared here
  202 | static void xact_prog_1();
      |             ^~~~~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c: In function ‘xact_prog_1’:
lat_rpc.c:240:1: warning: old-style function definition [-Wold-style-definition]
  240 | xact_prog_1(rqstp, transp)
      | ^~~~~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c:257:30: warning: assignment to ‘bool_t (*)(void)’ {aka ‘int (*)(void)’} from incompatible pointer type ‘bool_t (*)(XDR *, char *)’ {aka ‘int (*)(struct __rpc_xdr *, char *)’} [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
  257 |                 xdr_argument = xdr_char;
      |                              ^
In file included from /usr/include/tirpc/rpc/rpc.h:43:
/usr/include/tirpc/rpc/xdr.h:316:17: note: ‘xdr_char’ declared here
  316 | extern bool_t   xdr_char(XDR *, char *);
      |                 ^~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c:258:28: warning: assignment to ‘bool_t (*)(void)’ {aka ‘int (*)(void)’} from incompatible pointer type ‘bool_t (*)(XDR *, char *)’ {aka ‘int (*)(struct __rpc_xdr *, char *)’} [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
  258 |                 xdr_result = xdr_char;
      |                            ^
/usr/include/tirpc/rpc/xdr.h:316:17: note: ‘xdr_char’ declared here
  316 | extern bool_t   xdr_char(XDR *, char *);
      |                 ^~~~~~~~
lat_rpc.c:276:19: error: too many arguments to function ‘local’; expected 0, have 2
  276 |         result = (*local)(&argument, rqstp);
      |                  ~^~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~
gmake[2]: *** [Makefile:397: ../bin/x86_64-linux-gnu/lat_rpc] Error 1
make[1]: *** [Makefile:114: lmbench] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:23: results] Error 2
./performance/lmbench3                                           PASS    

Test suite complete                                              PASS    

Your log file is being submitted...
/home/gbcox/Downloads/kernel-tests/logs/kernel-test-1749415879.log.txt
{"message":"Upload successful!"}

The following information is not submitted with your log;
it is for informational purposes only.
Vulnerability status:
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/gather_data_sampling:Not affected
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/ghostwrite:Not affected
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/indirect_target_selection:Not affected
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/itlb_multihit:Not affected
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/l1tf:Not affected
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/mds:Not affected
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/meltdown:Not affected
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/mmio_stale_data:Not affected
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/reg_file_data_sampling:Not affected
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/retbleed:Not affected
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/spec_rstack_overflow:Mitigation: Safe RET
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/spec_store_bypass:Mitigation: Speculative Store Bypass disabled via prctl
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/spectre_v1:Mitigation: usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/spectre_v2:Mitigation: Enhanced / Automatic IBRS; IBPB: conditional; STIBP: always-on; PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected; BHI: Not affected
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/srbds:Not affected
/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/tsx_async_abort:Not affected
4

FYI - you can edit your post to fix them up

5

I’m sorry, I don’t understand. Can you provide an example.

6

In the … there is an edit option, the pencil icon.
Click in that and you can change your existing post.

7

I understand that, but how would you suggest I reformat? This is how it was displayed on my screen. Should this instead be directed at the people who wrote the program and ask them a better way to display their error output?

8

You insert the pre-formatted text mark up.
It’s this

```
put the three back quotes before and
after to pre-format text
```
9

That’s what I did in the reply to you, isn’t it?

10

yes - that is what the </> button does for you

11

Yeah, personally, I prefer the wrap-around text display rather than having to use the slider bars… but to each his own.

12

Where did this code come from?
The signature of client_rpc_xact_1 has args.
So that extern declaration is a bug.

13

This is part of the kernel testing package: QA:Testcase kernel regression - Fedora Project Wiki

Looks like it’s a problem with lmbench… I need to file a bug report.

Bug report here:
Kernel test lmbench bug/error

AI Summary:
You’ve hit upon a well-known and persistent issue in the Fedora kernel test suite! It’s frustrating when a test day is organized, but the test tools themselves have known, unaddressed bugs.

My search results confirm this. Specifically, the “Test Day:2024-01-21 Kernel 6.7 Test Week - Fedora Project Wiki” and “Test Day:2024-05-26 Kernel 6.9 Test Week - Fedora Project Wiki” pages show that users are explicitly reporting lmbench compilation errors during these test days.

For example, on the 2024-05-26 test day page, multiple users report:

"Performance Error: lib_timing.c: In function 'touch': lib_timing.c:1626:17: error: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'psize' [-Wimplicit-int] 1626 | static psize; | ^~~~~ gmake[2]: *** [Makefile:240: ../bin/x86_64-linux-gnu/lib_timing.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [Makefile:114: lmbench] Error 2 make: *** [Makefile:" (This is exactly the type of error we've been discussing).   

"the performance one can't be run as the test suite is still broken now too lib_tibtiming.o making lmbench3 to crash"

And the 2024-01-21 page even has a line item that says:

"runtests.sh -t performance error lib_timing.c:1626:17: error: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'psize' [-Wimplicit-int] [Makefile:240: ../bin/x86_64-linux-gnu/lib_timing.o] Error 1 [Makefile:114: lmbench] Error . . ./ performance/lmbench3 PASS Test suite complete PASS." (This is particularly interesting as it reports PASS for the overall lmbench3 even though it clearly failed to build).

This confirms:

The problem is widespread and known: You're not alone in experiencing this.
lmbench is bundled: The lmbench3 directory within performance is indeed where the problematic code resides.
It's an upstream lmbench issue compounded by modern compilers/libraries: lmbench is quite old and doesn't play well with recent GCC versions and the libtirpc implementation on Fedora.