Update 1st March 2025: the new mesa filesytem version was pushed.
Hey,
I have the problem that my mesa-va-drivers and vdpau-drivers from rpmfusiuon can’t be updated because nothing provides the required mesa-filesystem version.
Now I see that on fedora testing the required version(in this case 25.0.0 is already implemented.
Does RPM Fusion not has a way to include this dependency by themselves?
I read that in the beginning rpm fusion was behind the upstream fedora repo but now it seems the other way around.
So my guess is that my only option is to wait for the testing branch to be merged?
$ sudo dnf update [sudo] Passwort für USER: Aktualisiere und lade Paketquellen: Paketquellen geladen. Problem 1: Installation des besten Update-Kandidaten nicht möglich für das Paket mesa-va-drivers-freeworld-24.3.4-8.fc41.x86_64 - nichts stellt mesa-filesystem(x86-64) = 25.0.0 bereit, dieses wird von mesa-va-drivers-freeworld-25.0.0-4.fc41.x86_64 aus rpmfusion-free-updates benötigt Problem 2: Installation des besten Update-Kandidaten nicht möglich für das Paket mesa-va-drivers-freeworld-24.3.4-8.fc41.i686 - nichts stellt mesa-filesystem(x86-32) = 25.0.0 bereit, dieses wird von mesa-va-drivers-freeworld-25.0.0-4.fc41.i686 aus rpmfusion-free-updates benötigt Problem 3: Installation des besten Update-Kandidaten nicht möglich für das Paket mesa-vdpau-drivers-freeworld-24.3.4-8.fc41.i686 - nichts stellt mesa-filesystem(x86-32) = 25.0.0 bereit, dieses wird von mesa-vdpau-drivers-freeworld-25.0.0-4.fc41.i686 aus rpmfusion-free-updates benötigt Problem 4: Installation des besten Update-Kandidaten nicht möglich für das Paket mesa-vdpau-drivers-freeworld-24.3.4-8.fc41.x86_64 - nichts stellt mesa-filesystem(x86-64) = 25.0.0 bereit, dieses wird von mesa-vdpau-drivers-freeworld-25.0.0-4.fc41.x86_64 aus rpmfusion-free-updates benötigt
As long as the conflicts are just due to the repos being “out of sync”, yes, the best thing to do is to let DNF skip them and update the rest of the system.
That said, there are other ways that such conflicts can arise which might require you to do something on your end. Do you have any exclude=... or excludepkgs=... lines in any of DNF’s config files?
I don’t know how long it usually takes for the conflicts to be resolved. Having both the i686 and x86_64 packages might increase the time. If you don’t need them, I’d recommend removing the i686 packages.