I’d reiterate this Considering a general reorganization of this site! - #34 by t0xic0der here. Fedocal has been at a peripheral scope of the team, owing the fact that we’re undernumbered and the ones that we have are caught up in rewriting/maintaining other applications/sites such as Mote, Easyfix and sites.
We like to think the Fedocal is just the kind of application that deserves attention, both in terms of its look/feel as well as its functionality - and I wish that we were in a state to give it. Although of course, we can start with planning the end goals, technical checkpoints and a functional requirement analysis right now by forming an interest group.
Mind you, the interest group can be from any part of the community and they need not know about the technical specificities of the current codebase. As long as they have used the project for a considerable amount of time and feel that it has a scope to become better, they are more than welcome. The outcome of those discussions would help us pave the way on which the team would walk, a couple of release cycles down the line, for revamping Fedocal.
I understand that this time estimate does not look very good. Only if we had some more contributors interested in the technical side, I could have promised it sooner but maybe that can be something that the said interest group can add towards. Just imagine, with the discussions - there might be people stating their interest to actually work on the project hands-on. Wouldn’t that be wonderful?