Why still use Grub?

Hoping someone knows why Fedora chooses to still use grub instead of moving to something like systemd-boot, which seems to be the “next” choice for linux…

Seriously, just wondering and not trying to start some age-old flame war.

Thanks, all!

1 Like

It takes time to make changes that affect every user. As I understand it fedora is working toward the shift to systemd-boot.

You can search here and find a lot of entries (50+) related to systemd-boot.

There are a few core reasons:

  • sd-boot is UEFI only, and Fedora supports legacy BIOS and UEFI on x86
  • UEFI is not available on PowerPC or IBM Z
  • A number of features we’ve done over the years are GRUB-specific

It is possible to use systemd-boot if you want, but that means accepting the limitations of systemd-boot over other full-featured options.

2 Likes

I did some kind of testing a few weeks ago and got the fastest systemd-analyze time from the loader with GRUB set at 0 vs systemd-boot. I’m not in a rush to not use GRUB :stuck_out_tongue: