Hoping someone knows why Fedora chooses to still use grub instead of moving to something like systemd-boot, which seems to be the “next” choice for linux…
Seriously, just wondering and not trying to start some age-old flame war.
Thanks, all!
Hoping someone knows why Fedora chooses to still use grub instead of moving to something like systemd-boot, which seems to be the “next” choice for linux…
Seriously, just wondering and not trying to start some age-old flame war.
Thanks, all!
It takes time to make changes that affect every user. As I understand it fedora is working toward the shift to systemd-boot.
You can search here and find a lot of entries (50+) related to systemd-boot.
There are a few core reasons:
It is possible to use systemd-boot if you want, but that means accepting the limitations of systemd-boot over other full-featured options.
I did some kind of testing a few weeks ago and got the fastest systemd-analyze time from the loader with GRUB set at 0 vs systemd-boot. I’m not in a rush to not use GRUB ![]()