I’ll avoid to repeat here, but rather link where I suggested again[1] that the Wiki should ideally both more clearly communicate its actual purpose and be cleaned up accordingly.
Of course one may disagree with that suggestion and that’s fine. Contingent one agrees though, then the discussed guide is user-facing and therefore, in my opinion, does not belong to the Wiki.
Furthermore, the idea of multiple DEs coexisting might be a bit more advanced or tricky, but it can be a very valid use-case, like for a shared (eg family) system where different users have different DE preferences.
All things considered:
-
I completely agree that a warning should be placed accordingly regardless, because mixing and matching DEs can indeed bring up issues
-
Given the two suggested options I would find the second one a better fit
-
Given a well structured implementation of such category, there’s opportunity to host more issues/topics that appear to be “somewhat problematic” for their current placement, eg things like that Spotify (snap) conversation[2] or any similar that might come up in the future.