(Splitting this topic from https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/proposal-migrate-common-bugs-from-the-wiki-to-ask-fedora/71548/ to talk about docs.)
+100 for this.
Also I want to see a similar setup for “QuickDoc” in Ask as well.
(Splitting this topic from https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/proposal-migrate-common-bugs-from-the-wiki-to-ask-fedora/71548/ to talk about docs.)
+100 for this.
Also I want to see a similar setup for “QuickDoc” in Ask as well.
And if we are already talking about QuickDoc and Documents in general, please include a search field for the QuickDoc. It not matters if we don’t have an own search engine. Just include a Search-field who points to Google or DuckDuckGo.
Here’s the issues for docs search. Help wanted!
Hmmm. I see the appeal, but I have mixed feelings. Part of the idea of Fedora Docs is to get all of our scattered documentation in one place. The “Quick Docs” thing was meant to be an easy way to get that started from existing scattered wiki pages and other help articles. I definitely expected we’d have search in place sooner.
Discourse does have a Document Management Plugin, and we could enable that.
Advantages would be:
Disadvantages:
Also, we’d need some folks dedicated to “gardening” the document repository. We do have folks doing that now for Quick Docs, although not as many as I’d like.
I guess on the balance, I’d rather get that search thing fixed, and maybe figure out how we can more closely integrate. But it’s worth bringing this up with the Docs team. Maybe there’s some other hybrid approach we could take. (Like, maybe even changing the workflow for just that section of Quick Docs to pull from Discourse!)