Like Ben, I was also feeling unsure at first about abolishing editions… but the more I think about it, the more I like that idea too. Especially because it reduces a notable amount of tedious administrative work to update docs for new releases every cycle, and I don’t feel like that work brings a lot of value to our workflow. (A big hat tip to the valorous efforts of those who have done this often thankless work for several years!)
I also feel like there is a lot of value in Quick Docs, and there might be a lesson we can take from Quick Docs to apply more broadly to our project-wide documentation strategy. But I am on holiday right now and don’t have the time to put together a more thoughtful reply than this.
One thing I have always felt we did not utilize effectively in Fedora Docs is how Antora manages components and modules of documentation. I fell in love with Antora over other tool-chains for this reason mostly. But I feel like our initial roll-out was too decentralized, and as such, content ends up getting lost. Perhaps we could centralize more content together in a single repo, and better organize it across modules. If we used a platform like GitLab, we could also have code-owners who could be auto-assigned for reviewing content from other modules (but I don’t want to derail this thread on GitLab vs. Pagure, it was just a thought).