Well, I’m not sure if I can agree to that. Obviously, a whole category such as Quick Docs would need more than one maintainer. So do the release Docs. It’s not just the Quick Docs. Be aware that these are linked to docs - and contribute to the bad reputation and trust.
Why create new things if we are not able to maintain what we have? Directly interpreted, I agree with you: but we do not need to author more content to increase Docs, but to replace old Docs that are obsolete at all. And then we need to ensure that things remain maintained. Generally spoken, and without insisting on “members assigned as maintainers”: these are complex social dynamics we have to facilitate because they do not yet exist (at least not in a sufficient manner).
Authors come when they trust and use Docs. If they don’t do both, why should they come to author? Or why should they expect others to use/trust?
Agreed 
… which is still our flagship. I agree that we do not need to do something on Silverblue or so, that was one of my points, so no objection about that.
Agreed. But we need to focus what is needed and do what we can. There is not just everything or nothing. The need is a workstation guide, especially for Beginners. There is one but it is maintained somewhere else and also no longer up to date. A server guide and CoreOS would be nice of course, but it ain’t that critical. I assume a server user will be able to get through the process somehow.
It will be based upon the distributed guide, which is roughly comparable in its approach to the 7-steps, as described above. I will compare Workstation and KDE, but I think the guide can cover both. It will focus the live images obviously. Only the maintenance of creating the boot media with Windows and Mac is something I cannot do.
Well, that makes indeed sense! Especially, in terms of separating a maintained install guide from the obsolete pages! Of course, our focus has to be clearly on the official Workstation, but it might be an idea to use a description below the “Workstation” title which indicates that it can be also used for KDE, and as far as possible, details both (at least in major things that are relevant for vast users). Much is transferable (as I said, I have not yet tested it, but I think the install guide can also cover both). Nevertheless, maintenance capabilities have to be kept in mind.
It is definitely the major part in ask.fp, followed by KDE spin (it cannot always be identified if something is Workstation or KDE). But we also have a large amount of Silverblue issues.
Well, I think this will still take some time until Silverblue will replace Workstation as major edition.