Fedora CoreOS Meeting Minutes 2023-05-31

#fedora-meeting-1: fedora_coreos_meeting

Meeting started by spresti at 16:30:44 UTC (full logs).

Meeting summary

  1. roll call (spresti, 16:30:56)
  2. Action items from last meeting (spresti, 16:35:07)
    1. there were no action items from last meeting! (spresti, 16:35:17)

  3. tracker: Fedora 39 changes considerations (spresti, 16:35:43)
    1. https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1491 (spresti, 16:36:06)
    2. https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/configuring-IMDS-new-instances.html#configure-IMDS-new-instances-ami-configuration > Looks like just adding a flag/parameter (travier, 16:42:10)
    3. AGREED: We will update our AWS AMIs with the IMDSv2-only flag for F39. that change could potentially break some applications, so we'll mention that change in the announcement for the F39 rebase and opening of `next` (spresti, 16:55:23)
    4. https://fedoramagazine.org/new-aws-storage-type-for-fedora-linux/ (travier, 17:02:58)
    5. AGREED: Set EC2 AMIs default to the gp3 EBS volume type for f39. Include it in release notes to inform users. (spresti, 17:04:48)
    6. AGREED: We'll switch AMIs to uefi-preferred for F39. (spresti, 17:10:39)
    7. AGREED: Let mkosi-initrd land in fedora and allow it to mature before starting to adopt it into fcos. Revisit for f40 considerations. (spresti, 17:22:11)
    8. https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1465 (travier, 17:23:06)

  4. Open Floor (spresti, 17:25:10)

Meeting ended at 17:29:33 UTC (full logs).

Action items

  1. (none)

People present (lines said)

  1. dustymabe (65)
  2. travier (62)
  3. spresti (56)
  4. bgilbert (42)
  5. zodbot (17)
  6. marmijo[m] (4)
  7. fifofonix (2)
  8. ravanell_ (2)
  9. siosm (0)
  10. marmijo (0)

Generated by MeetBot 0.4.

I think these might warrant a Self-Contained Change, for visibility.

@mattdm, do we need separate Changes for Fedora CoreOS? These actions are being taken in accordance with the existing Self-Contained Changes for gp3 and uefi-preferred.

No expert here, but I don’t think we need our own Self Contained Change proposal, but it might be nice to add some language to the existing Changes to indicate that include Fedora CoreOS.

Ah, okay — in that case, yeah, no separate change, but as Dusty mentions, an update to that change would be helpful.