I disagree. I also think that question is a strategic project direction that is squarely in the perview of Fedora Council.
I don’t want to derail the discussion about this change with a deep dive into strategic direction of Fedora flatpaks to far. I’ve already commented above about possible directions.
I will say this. I expect Fedora flatpaks to continue to exist. Continuing to have a call to stop all operations is not constructive.
I want to ensure it has a scoped mission that makes sense as a benefit for the wider ecosystem in some capacity. I want to make sure its sustainable, that draws on lessons learned historically from EPEL. And if I can figure out a way to do this in partnership with flathub so its existance feels less duplicative. But that’s all just context for possible futures. None of which do I envision shuttering Fedora flatpaks entirely.