F43 Change Proposal: Wayland-only GNOME (self-contained)

It seems you misunderstood me. I was referring to these two paths

/usr/lib/systemd/user/gnome-session-x11-services-ready.target.wants/org.gnome.SettingsDaemon.XSettings.service
/usr/lib/systemd/user/gnome-session-x11-services.target.wants/org.gnome.SettingsDaemon.XSettings.service

, not this file /usr/lib/systemd/user/org.gnome.SettingsDaemon.XSettings.service.

Once these two files

/usr/lib/systemd/user/gnome-session-x11-services-ready.target
/usr/lib/systemd/user/gnome-session-x11-services.target

disappear due to gnome-session disabling X11, those two directories

/usr/lib/systemd/user/gnome-session-x11-services-ready.target.wants/
/usr/lib/systemd/user/gnome-session-x11-services.target.wants/

also lose their reason for existence.

when that
happens it pulls in gnome-session-x11-services.target

What he said doesn’t align with what we’re doing, because after disabling X11, we no longer have this systemd target.

After disabling X11, gnome-session includes the following files:

rpm -ql gnome-session | grep /lib/systemd
/usr/lib/systemd/user/gnome-launched-.scope.d
/usr/lib/systemd/user/gnome-launched-.scope.d/override.conf
/usr/lib/systemd/user/gnome-session-failed.service
/usr/lib/systemd/user/gnome-session-failed.target
/usr/lib/systemd/user/gnome-session-initialized.target
/usr/lib/systemd/user/gnome-session-manager.target
/usr/lib/systemd/user/gnome-session-manager@.service
/usr/lib/systemd/user/gnome-session-monitor.service
/usr/lib/systemd/user/gnome-session-pre.target
/usr/lib/systemd/user/gnome-session-restart-dbus.service
/usr/lib/systemd/user/gnome-session-shutdown.target
/usr/lib/systemd/user/gnome-session-signal-init.service
/usr/lib/systemd/user/gnome-session-wayland.target
/usr/lib/systemd/user/gnome-session-wayland@.target
/usr/lib/systemd/user/gnome-session.target
/usr/lib/systemd/user/gnome-session@.target
/usr/lib/systemd/user/gnome-session@gnome.target.d
/usr/lib/systemd/user/gnome-session@gnome.target.d/gnome.session.conf

I’ve confirmed that this is a bug and I’ve filed a report upstream.

3 Likes

183 posts were split to a new topic: Wayland-only Gnome (continuation of proposal discussion)

#3408 Change: Wayland-only GNOME

Closed: Accepted 16 days ago by sgallagh. Opened a month ago by amoloney.

I made the split now. The topic here has fulfilled it’s purpose 16 days ago.

It is still a hot topic, so i moved the over left of this discussion into Ask Fedora (link see above)

If you have more doubts please create a new (own) topic in the Ask Fedora section. Best way to get a clear and helpful answer is, while asking with passing enough of information in to the request.

If you new, please start reading in the Ask Fedora > Start Here section.

@ngompa feel free to give some ending words to this proposal and take it in consideration to close it.

1 Like

This conversation has long since run its course, and the other less-relevant discussion has been split out, so I’m closing it.

1 Like

This change has been accepted by FESCo for Fedora Linux 43. A full list of approved changes to date can be found on the Change Set Page.

To find out more about how our changes policy works, please visit our docs site.

As this change is now processed, this discussion thread will remain closed to avoid further unintentional disagreements. Thank you all for your conversation, and thank you to the change owners for their engagement on this thread.

4 Likes