Another topic, if you have some time left at the end:
-
I lost the owner rights of the “Fedora Linux Workstation and Spins User Guide” repo when it was transferred to the Docs. I would like to have ownership rights for this repo again. There have already been some actions I cannot do atm.
-
To get a maintenance strategy that avoids the “Fedora Linux Workstation and Spins User Guide” to end up with the same problems as the old Docs, I have added an “interim” strategy as example, which might be discussed: see the MAINTAINER.md in the repo. Especially the “warning” status (or category) might be interesting, and could be developed into an alternative approach on its own (we talked already in the past about the warning sign for old content). Just to have something to start a discussion.
Don’t forget: we do not need a strategy that facilitates massive amounts of pages → Fedora users can and do use upstream docs because Fedora keeps compatibility upstream (our demand is different to other communities). Ask.fp triggers appropriate forwarding, too. But the few Fedora-related pages we need to provide have to be trustworthy (or at least let the users know when and where they can rely on what they see). (We can learn from Silverblue in this respect, but should not forget that their unified way of Docs delivery/provision differs to ours:)
