alextrune
October 30, 2019, 1:29pm
1
Hi I am trying to sudo dnf update But I get an error.
Error: Transaction test error:
file /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/60-nvidia.rules from install of nvidia-kmod-common-3:435.21-3.fc30.noarch conflicts with file from package xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-3:430.40-1.fc30.x86_64
This is the output of dnf repolist
$ dnf repolist
Copr repo for discord owned by tcg 8.0 kB/s | 3.4 kB 00:00
cuda 25 kB/s | 2.5 kB 00:00
Fedora Modular 30 - x86_64 32 kB/s | 17 kB 00:00
negativo17 - Nvidia 4.9 kB/s | 3.9 kB 00:00
Fedora Modular 30 - x86_64 - Updates 29 kB/s | 16 kB 00:00
Fedora 30 - x86_64 - Updates 23 kB/s | 14 kB 00:00
Fedora 30 - x86_64 - Updates 769 kB/s | 2.5 MB 00:03
google-chrome 7.3 kB/s | 1.3 kB 00:00
google-chrome 9.5 kB/s | 3.4 kB 00:00
MEGAsync 1.2 kB/s | 1.5 kB 00:01
RPM Fusion for Fedora 30 - Free - Updates 6.3 kB/s | 3.6 kB 00:00
RPM Fusion for Fedora 30 - Free - Updates 235 kB/s | 375 kB 00:01
RPM Fusion for Fedora 30 - Nonfree - Updates 6.3 kB/s | 3.7 kB 00:00
RPM Fusion for Fedora 30 - Nonfree - Updates 54 kB/s | 70 kB 00:01
repo id repo name status
MEGAsync MEGAsync 18
copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:tcg:discord Copr repo for discord owned by 2
cuda cuda 297
*fedora Fedora 30 - x86_64 56,582
*fedora-modular Fedora Modular 30 - x86_64 135
fedora-nvidia negativo17 - Nvidia 160
google-chrome google-chrome 3
*rpmfusion-free RPM Fusion for Fedora 30 - Fre 616
*rpmfusion-free-updates RPM Fusion for Fedora 30 - Fre 290
*rpmfusion-nonfree RPM Fusion for Fedora 30 - Non 227
*rpmfusion-nonfree-updates RPM Fusion for Fedora 30 - Non 68
*updates Fedora 30 - x86_64 - Updates 13,737
*updates-modular Fedora Modular 30 - x86_64 - U 144
I am using the negativo17 repo for some nvidia stuff as I needed it to get the CUDA dev kit working on fedora. Nvidia driver, CUDA tools and libraries – negativo17.org
1 Like
vgaetera
October 31, 2019, 6:41am
2
Try to remove it:
sudo dnf remove /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/60-nvidia.rules
Then upgrade and reinstall the removed packages if necessary.
xtym
October 31, 2019, 9:53am
4
I am just curious about a thing when you have active rpmfusion and negative is there some possibility of that some package with the same name was updated from 2 differents parts? My first post was deleted because I hade missed the real question.
@vgaetera did a good suggestion try delete packages in conflict and after reinstall them. Normally it should work.
Regards.
1 Like
alextrune
October 31, 2019, 4:16pm
5
sudo dnf remove /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/60-nvidia.rules
[sudo] password for a_trune:
Dependencies resolved.
================================================================================
Package Arch Version Repository Size
================================================================================
Removing:
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia x86_64 3:430.40-1.fc30 @rpmfusion-nonfree-updates
20 M
Removing dependent packages:
akmod-nvidia x86_64 3:430.40-1.fc30 @rpmfusion-nonfree-updates
22 k
cuda-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130-1 @cuda 0
kmod-nvidia-5.2.13-200.fc30.x86_64 x86_64 3:430.40-1.fc30 @@commandline 28 M
kmod-nvidia-5.2.17-200.fc30.x86_64 x86_64 3:430.40-1.fc30 @@commandline 28 M
kmod-nvidia-5.2.18-200.fc30.x86_64 x86_64 3:430.40-1.fc30 @@commandline 28 M
Removing unused dependencies:
akmods noarch 0.5.6-20.fc30 @updates 37 k
cuda-command-line-tools-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130-1 @cuda 0
cuda-compiler-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130-1 @cuda 0
cuda-cublas-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130-1 @cuda 68 M
cuda-cublas-dev-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130-1 @cuda 85 M
cuda-cufft-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130-1 @cuda 99 M
cuda-cufft-dev-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130-1 @cuda 223 M
cuda-cuobjdump-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130-1 @cuda 293 k
cuda-cupti-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130-1 @cuda 7.9 M
cuda-curand-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130-1 @cuda 58 M
cuda-curand-dev-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130-1 @cuda 123 M
cuda-cusolver-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130-1 @cuda 133 M
cuda-cusolver-dev-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130-1 @cuda 82 M
cuda-cusparse-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130-1 @cuda 56 M
cuda-cusparse-dev-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130-1 @cuda 121 M
cuda-demo-suite-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130-1 @cuda 11 M
cuda-documentation-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130-1 @cuda 219 M
cuda-gdb-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130-1 @cuda 9.6 M
cuda-gpu-library-advisor-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130-1 @cuda 1.1 M
cuda-libraries-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130-1 @cuda 0
cuda-libraries-dev-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130-1 @cuda 0
cuda-memcheck-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130-1 @cuda 388 k
cuda-misc-headers-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130-1 @cuda 9.1 M
cuda-npp-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130-1 @cuda 124 M
cuda-npp-dev-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130-1 @cuda 142 M
cuda-nsight-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130-1 @cuda 292 M
cuda-nvcc-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130-1 @cuda 58 M
cuda-nvdisasm-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130-1 @cuda 22 M
cuda-nvgraph-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130-1 @cuda 85 M
cuda-nvgraph-dev-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130-1 @cuda 178 M
cuda-nvjpeg-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130.1-1 @cuda 4.3 M
cuda-nvjpeg-dev-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130.1-1 @cuda 4.4 M
cuda-nvml-dev-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130-1 @cuda 370 k
cuda-nvprof-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130-1 @cuda 26 M
cuda-nvprune-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130-1 @cuda 85 k
cuda-nvrtc-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130-1 @cuda 24 M
cuda-nvrtc-dev-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130-1 @cuda 25 k
cuda-nvtx-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130-1 @cuda 339 k
cuda-nvvp-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130-1 @cuda 129 M
cuda-runtime-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130-1 @cuda 0
cuda-samples-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130-1 @cuda 199 M
cuda-toolkit-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130-1 @cuda 0
cuda-tools-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130-1 @cuda 0
cuda-visual-tools-10-0 x86_64 10.0.130-1 @cuda 0
egl-wayland x86_64 1.1.4-1.fc30 @updates 80 k
elfutils-libelf-devel x86_64 0.177-1.fc30 @updates 32 k
freeglut-devel x86_64 3.0.0-10.fc30 @fedora 112 k
gl-manpages noarch 1.1-18.20190306.fc30
@fedora 936 k
java-1.8.0-openjdk x86_64 1:1.8.0.222.b10-0.fc30
@updates 877 k
kernel-devel x86_64 5.2.17-200.fc30 @updates 53 M
kernel-devel x86_64 5.2.13-200.fc30 @updates 53 M
kernel-devel x86_64 5.2.18-200.fc30 @updates 53 M
kmodtool noarch 1-34.fc30 @updates 18 k
libICE-devel x86_64 1.0.9-15.fc30 @fedora 262 k
libSM-devel x86_64 1.2.3-2.fc30 @fedora 19 k
libX11-devel x86_64 1.6.7-1.fc30 @fedora 1.0 M
libXau-devel x86_64 1.0.9-1.fc30 @fedora 6.4 k
libXdamage-devel x86_64 1.1.4-16.fc30 @fedora 2.5 k
libXext-devel x86_64 1.3.3-11.fc30 @fedora 99 k
libXfixes-devel x86_64 5.0.3-9.fc30 @fedora 9.0 k
libXi-devel x86_64 1.7.10-1.fc30 @updates 126 k
libXmu-devel x86_64 1.1.2-13.fc30 @fedora 66 k
libXt-devel x86_64 1.1.5-11.20190424gitba4ec9376.fc30
@updates 1.6 M
libXxf86vm-devel x86_64 1.1.4-11.fc30 @fedora 12 k
libdrm-devel x86_64 2.4.99-1.fc30 @updates 562 k
libglvnd-core-devel x86_64 1:1.1.0-4.gitf92208b.fc30
@fedora 40 k
libglvnd-devel x86_64 1:1.1.0-4.gitf92208b.fc30
@fedora 0
libglvnd-opengl x86_64 1:1.1.0-4.gitf92208b.fc30
@fedora 202 k
libxcb-devel x86_64 1.13.1-2.fc30 @fedora 2.6 M
mesa-khr-devel x86_64 19.1.7-1.fc30 @updates 10 k
mesa-libGL-devel x86_64 19.1.7-1.fc30 @updates 1.6 M
mesa-libGLES x86_64 19.1.7-1.fc30 @updates 0
mesa-libGLU-devel x86_64 9.0.0-17.fc30 @fedora 20 k
nvidia-persistenced x86_64 3:430.40-1.fc30 @rpmfusion-nonfree-updates
98 k
nvidia-settings x86_64 3:430.40-1.fc30 @rpmfusion-nonfree-updates
5.2 M
ttmkfdir x86_64 3.0.9-56.fc30 @fedora 152 k
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-cuda x86_64 3:430.40-1.fc30 @rpmfusion-nonfree-updates
927 k
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-cuda-libs x86_64 3:430.40-1.fc30 @rpmfusion-nonfree-updates
103 M
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-kmodsrc x86_64 3:430.40-1.fc30 @rpmfusion-nonfree-updates
11 M
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs x86_64 3:430.40-1.fc30 @rpmfusion-nonfree-updates
149 M
xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 noarch 7.5-21.fc30 @fedora 863 k
xorg-x11-proto-devel noarch 2018.4-3.fc30 @fedora 1.7 M
zlib-devel x86_64 1.2.11-18.fc30 @updates 138 k
Transaction Summary
================================================================================
Remove 89 Packages
Freed space: 3.1 G
Is this ok [y/N]: n
Operation aborted.
I need a lot of these packages for CUDA (tensorflow stuff). Is it safe to remove them anyway?
xtym
October 31, 2019, 8:45pm
6
It looks bad, in this way it is deleting important packages…and dnf remove with the option of excluding autoremove is not a good solution either.
My opinion is that shouldn’t have been actived rpmfusion and negative17 repo same time. I believe they are mixing packages under updates. At this point maybe you should try through gnome boxes create a vm of fedora and use only negative17 repo to install Nvidia…test this virtual machine under some weeks and check that you have not problems to update…after you can active rpm fusion and see if you come to the same issue after some weeks…sure that it should appear. If you didn’t have problems under testing with only negative active…you can think about do a backup of your data and begin with a clean installation of fedora in the way that you did test before trough these VM.
I hope really you can solve the issue.
alextrune
October 31, 2019, 11:53pm
7
I’ll do a fresh reinstall of fedora 31 soon, hopefully I can get CUDA working then without negativo.