Thanks. I have heard of it before. I read the guide, I don’t see any benefit from the description. So the OS is ‘the same as every other installation of it’. I don’t understand why that’s a good thing, obviously my understanding/knowledge is limiting my ability to see what may be useful benefits.
In my semi-ignorant position, I just see risks of more problems, especially when it talks about how the apps don’t have access to any of the host system. I like the ‘sound’ of that, but I have had a lot of problems since starting out with Fedora, very much due to this point. For example my Thunderbird installation had to be switched from Flatpak to RPM (as did Brave and a few others) because it didn’t ‘just work’ nicely, after investigation and help from users here, I foudn it was because of that ‘isolation’ the apps had. So, for example, Thunderbird couldn’t open file attachments in some cases.
Overall I don’t see how Atomic will improve my situation/experience, but interested to hear how it might