2024-04-01 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 40 Blocker Review Meeting

Hi folks! It’s time for another blocker review meeting. We have 3 proposed blockers for Final.

Here is a handy link which should show you the meeting time in your local time.

The meeting will be on Matrix. Click the link above to join in a web client - you can authenticate with your FAS account - or use a dedicated client of your choosing.

If you have time today, you can take a look at the proposed or accepted blockers before the meeting - the full lists can be found here.

Remember, you can also now vote on bugs outside of review meetings! If you look at the bug list in the blockerbugs app, you’ll see links labeled “Vote!” next to all proposed blockers and freeze exceptions. Those links take you to tickets where you can vote. This page has instructions on how exactly you do it. We usually go through the tickets shortly before the meeting and apply any clear votes, so the meeting will just cover bugs where there wasn’t a clear outcome in the ticket voting yet. THIS MEANS IF YOU VOTE NOW, THE MEETING WILL BE SHORTER!

We’ll be evaluating these bugs to see if they violate any of the Release Criteria and warrant the blocking of a release if they’re not fixed. Information on the release criteria for F40 can be found on the wiki.

For more information about the Blocker and Freeze exception process, check out these links:

And for those of you who are curious how a Blocker Review Meeting works - or how it’s supposed to go and you want to run one - check out the SOP on the wiki.

Have a good day and see you tomorrow!

#blocker-review:fedoraproject.org: F40-blocker-review

Meeting started by @adamwill:fedora.im at 16:01:52 UTC

Meeting summary

  1. TOPIC:Roll Call (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:01:56)
  2. TOPIC:Introduction (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:10:26)
    1. INFO: Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:10:33)
    2. INFO: We'll be following the process outlined at: (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:10:36)
    3. LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:10:39)
    4. INFO: The bugs up for review today are available at: (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:10:41)
    5. LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:10:44)
    6. INFO: The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:10:47)
    7. LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Basic_Release_Criteria (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:10:50)
    8. LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_40_Beta_Release_Criteria (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:10:53)
    9. LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_40_Final_Release_Criteria (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:10:55)
    10. INFO: for Final, we have: (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:11:17)
    11. INFO: 3 Proposed Blockers (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:11:21)
    12. INFO: 2 Accepted Blockers (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:11:24)
    13. INFO: 1 Accepted Previous Release Blockers (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:11:27)
    14. INFO: 1 Accepted Freeze Exceptions (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:11:29)
    15. INFO: Neil Hanlon will secretarialize, thanks neil (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:14:41)
  3. TOPIC:(2271837) The KDE help center does not show the documentation for KDE applications. (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:14:55)
    1. LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2271837 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:14:57)
    2. LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1544 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:15:01)
    3. INFO: Proposed Blocker, khelpcenter, NEW (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:15:04)
    4. INFO: Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+0,0,-1) (-nielsenb) (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:15:07)
    5. AGREED: 2271837 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) - this is accepted as a violation of Final criterion "For all release-blocking desktop / arch combinations, the following applications must start successfully and withstand a basic functionality test: ... help viewer" (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:22:03)
  4. TOPIC:(2272149) Loupe cannot open JPEG images (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:22:15)
    1. LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2272149 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:22:18)
    2. LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1545 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:22:20)
    3. INFO: Proposed Blocker, loupe, NEW (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:22:23)
    4. INFO: Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+3,0,-0) (+geraldosimiao, +catanzaro, +nielsenb) (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:22:25)
    5. AGREED: 2272149 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) - this is accepted as a clear violation of "For all release-blocking desktop / arch combinations, the following applications must start successfully and withstand a basic functionality test: ... image viewer" (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:27:05)
  5. TOPIC:(2270209) Firmware RAID set not usable in anaconda when booting native UEFI: "ERROR:blivet:failed to determine name for the md array a7ff7f19-f142-4329-6b52-1dbafa835906" (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:27:13)
    1. LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270209 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:27:16)
    2. LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1533 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:27:19)
    3. INFO: Proposed Blocker, python-blivet, ASSIGNED (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:27:22)
    4. INFO: Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+0,0,-1) (-nielsenb) (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:27:25)
    5. INFO: Ticket vote: BetaFreezeException (+2,0,-0) (+geraldosimiao, +ngompa) (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:27:27)
    6. AGREED: 2270209 - punt (delay decision) - unfortunately we have to punt on this again as we still do not have sufficient information to make an informed decision. testing on more hardware would be very valuable here (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:43:31)
  6. TOPIC:Accepted blocker check-in (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:43:56)
    1. INFO: 2269412 is on the way to being fixed, fixed update is in testing and some testers have confirmed the fix (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:44:11)
    2. INFO: 2269286 - it turns out this needs a bunch of deps to be updated for an optimal fix. Fabio is working on that; if it can't be completed in time, we have the fallback option of building snapshot with some deps bundled in (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:45:06)
  7. TOPIC:Open floor (@adamwill:fedora.im, 16:47:48)

Meeting ended at 16:55:16 UTC

Action items

  1. (none)

People present (lines said)

  1. @adamwill:fedora.im (86)
  2. @conan_kudo:matrix.org (31)
  3. @nhanlon:beeper.com (20)
  4. @sgallagh:fedora.im (17)
  5. @nielsenb:fedora.im (13)
  6. @farribeiro:matrix.org (11)
  7. @geraldosimiao:matrix.org (8)
  8. @zodbot:fedora.im (7)
  9. @pboy:fedora.im (4)
  10. @meetbot:fedora.im (2)